Table 6 Descriptives for items no. 7, 8, and 12 through 19
Descriptives | N | Min | Max | Mean | Std. dev. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
7. If I were to play the game again, I would select another group. | 29 | 1 | 6 | 2.79 | 1.84 |
8. If I were to play the game again, I would stay in the group, but decide for a different strategy. | 29 | 1 | 6 | 2.83 | 1.34 |
12. The game helped me to further develop my capacities of strategic thinking. | 30 | 2 | 6 | 4.60 | 1.13 |
13. Political games are a very valuable method to learn about the interrelations between science, technology, and society. | 30 | 3 | 6 | 5.00 | 0.98 |
14. Collaboration in my group was good in terms of output and efficiency. | 29 | 2 | 6 | 5.66 | 0.81 |
15. Collaboration in my group was good in terms of mutual respect. | 30 | 4 | 6 | 5.73 | 0.52 |
16. The game achieved a high level of realism: in reality, things would most likely develop similarly. | 30 | 2 | 6 | 4.23 | 1.07 |
17. It was easy for me to identify and play the role that my group and I had to represent in the game. | 30 | 3 | 6 | 5.10 | 1.03 |
18. It was sometimes hard not to feel personally attacked by criticism within my group. | 29 | 1 | 5 | 1.72 | 1.07 |
19. It was sometimes hard not to feel personally attacked by actions of other game groups. | 30 | 1 | 5 | 2.03 | 1.40 |