Table 4 Items used to assess (i) students’ satisfaction with the game
Descriptives | N | Min | Max | Mean (rec) | Std. dev. | Study by Tafner et al. [38] | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Mean | Std. dev. | ||||||
1. I would like to play the game again with the same scenario | 29 | 2 | 6 | 4.21 | 1.15 | 181 | 4.3 | 1.6 |
2. I did not enjoy my participation in the game.* | 30 | 1 | 6 | 1.77 (5.23) | 1.33 | 181 | 5.1 | 1.2 |
3. One can learn to be a good strategist | 28 | 3 | 6 | 4.75 | 1.11 | 180 | 3.6 | 1.3 |
4. I did learn nothing new during the political game.* | 30 | 1 | 5 | 1.90 (5.10) | 1.16 | 180 | 4.4 | 1.5 |
5. Political games should be a more frequent element of university courses, even in such that focus on technology like ours | 28 | 1 | 6 | 4.18 | 1,52 | 180 | 3.8 | 1.5 |
6. The time needed for the game could have been used better.* | 30 | 1 | 5 | 2.07 (4.93) | 1,048 | 180 | 5.0 | 1.3 |