# Review finding | Relevant papers | CERQual assessment | Explanation of CERQual assessment |
---|---|---|---|
1. Category: European ethos | |||
(a) Multilingualism, cultural diversity and the promotion of human rights are consistently identified as ‘European values’. | Du Bois-Reymond [5], Osler [24], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Ros et al. [29], Thorpe [34], Spannring et al. [32], Sperling [33], Udrea [35], Llurda et al. [18] | High confidence | Nine studies with N/VMC about methodological limitations, coherence, relevance and adequacy. |
(b) Perceptions of what it means to be European vary greatly depending on national geopolitical contexts. | Du Bois-Reymond [5], Osler [24], Wilkins et al. [40], Sperling [33], Van Mol [3] | High confidence | Five studies; minor concerns regarding adequacy due to restricted number of explicit allusions to the topic. |
(c) EU institutions are perceived as distant, complex and over-bureaucratized entities. | Du Bois-Reymond [5], Fernández [8], Fuss and Grosser [9], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Ros et al. [29] | Moderate confidence | Five studies; minor concerns regarding coherence due to inconsistent findings in one study. Moderate concerns regarding methodological limitations due to poor reporting of evidence in one study. |
(d) The support for further integration is scarce, especially if candidate countries are culturally divergent. | Du Bois-Reymond [5], Licata [17], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Pollmann [26], Spannring et al. [32], Thorpe [34], Llurda et al. [18] | Moderate confidence | Seven studies; moderate concerns regarding coherence due to conflicting findings in one of the studies and somewhat incoherent findings in another study. |
2. Category: Self-identification | |||
(e) Self-identification of students is compatible with the ‘nested identities’ theory. Students negotiate local, regional, national and supranational identities. | Osler [24], Licata [17], Fuss and Grosser [9], Erling [7], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Pollman [26], Thorpe [34], Udrea [35], Genova [10], Byram et al. [1] | High confidence | Eleven studies; minor concerns regarding coherence due to context-dependent contradictory findings in one of the studies. |
(f) The prevalence of national identities in students’ minds is closely linked to affective factors. | Osler [24], Erling [7], Fuss and Grosser [9], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Pollmann [26], Ros et al. [29], Spannring et al. [32], Udrea [35] | High confidence | Eight studies; minor concerns regarding coherence due contradictory findings in one of the studies but restricted to a specific subgroup of population. |
3. Category: Predictors of endorsement and opposition | |||
(g) Support for the EU is rooted on instrumental / utilitarian motivations. | Osler [24], Licata [17], Fernández [8], Fuss and Grosser [9], Thorpe [34], Sperling [33], Udrea [35], Byram et al. [1] | High confidence | Nine studies; minor concerns regarding methodological limitations due to poor reporting of evidence in one study. |
(h) Speaking foreign languages favours identification with supranational identities and Europe. | Fuss and Grosser [9], Erling [7], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Spannring et al. [32], Thorpe [34], Byram et al. [1] | High confidence | Six studies; minor concerns regarding coherence due to contradictory findings in one study. |
(i) National or cultural identity loss is the biggest perceived threat of endorsing a European identity. | Du Bois-Reymond [5], Licata [17], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Spannring et al. [32] | Moderate confidence | Four studies; minor concerns regarding coherence due to contradictory findings in one study and moderate concerns regarding adequacy due to limited number of contributing studies. |
4. Category: Foreign country experiences | |||
(j) Academic sojourns have a positive impact on students’ support for the EU. | Osler [24], Udrea [35], Van Mol [3], Hadfield and Summerby-Murray [12], Genova [10], Llurda et al. [18] | Moderate confidence | Six studies; moderate concerns about coherence due to contradictory findings in three of the studies. |
(k) Exposure through leisure or spontaneous travel to Europe facilitates students’ European identification. | Fuss and Grosser [9], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Spannring et al. [32], Thorpe [34] | Moderate confidence | Four studies; minor concerns about coherence because of contradictory findings in one of the studies and moderate concerns regarding adequacy due to limited number of contributing studies. |
(l) Intentional pedagogic interventions are desirable to raise European awareness. | Osler [24], Grundy and Jamieson [11], Spannring et al. [32], Thorpe [34], Wilkins et al. [40], Van Mol [3], Hadfield and Summerby-Murray [12] | High confidence | Seven studies; moderate concerns regarding methodological limitations due to poor reporting from one study on collected evidence. |