From: European Business Ethics agenda based on a Delphi analysis
Data collection | 10 March 2015 till 6 September 2015 |
Summary of procedure | We have sent a questionnaire to European experts with 3 open questions. Next, we designed another survey based on the responses to the first one. Then, we finished with the third round, which was based on a rank questionnaire. |
Representativeness of Sample | The Delphi panel experts were chosen using two criteria: â‹… Minimum of 3 Business Ethics papers published in high quality journals (Journal Citation Report JCR). â‹… European experts. |
Sample size for statistical power and significant findings | We selected 17 experts but 12 agreed to being our Delphi experts participants, so the Delphi panel is made up of 12 experts. Countries: Europe (France, Spain, UK, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland, Germany, and Hungary). |
Construct validity | It is guaranteed. Experts validate the interpretation and categorization of the variables. Apart of questions there is also an open place to explain their responds opinions or made some suggestions. |
Anonymity | All experts are anonymous in relation to one another, but never to the researcher. |
Non-response issues | 5 out of 29 iterations failed. |
Dropout rate | There is only a dropout; one expert did not take part in the third round. However, we provide the conclusions keeping this in mind. |
Round number | 3 rounds. Each round had three petitions for each expert. |
Time to respond | An average of 7.14 days (6.5 days the first round; 5.33 days the second round and 9.6 days the third round). |
Contact form | Email survey |
Survey type | Structured survey |