Skip to main content

Table 7 Evaluating the resource gap for each option and their sub-ordinate tasks

From: Using systems thinking to design actionable futures: a nuclear weapons example

Factor Sub-category From To Resource Gap
  F3 Weak Islamic faction F4 Ineffective Islamic faction  
Focused military strikes on enemy leadership 1 3 2
  L2 Strong Loyalist L1 Dominating Loyalists  
Provide military training to Loyalists 1 2 1
Form coalition with US and India so as to leverage their military assets 2 3 1
  I5 No intervention I1 Welcomed and effective intervention  
PR campaign that supports an international intervention 2 3 1
Build a coalition for an intervention 2 4 2
Focus international community on risk of unsecured nukes to garner support 2 2 0
Lobby UN in support of intervention 2 2 0
  M3 Supported but weak militants M1/3 Supported / not supported but weak militants  
Eliminate support links between Islamic Faction and Militants 1 2 1
  N2 Known and unsafe nuclear weapons N1/3 Known or unknown and Safe nuclear weapons  
Use SF to locate nuclear weapons 1 4 3
  S3 Shaky internal stability S2 Stable internal stability  
Deploy humanitarian forces to stabilise Pakistan 2 2 0