From: Using systems thinking to design actionable futures: a nuclear weapons example
Islamic Faction | Loyalists, | International Intervention, | Militants, | Nuclear Weapons | Internal Stability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 Dominating | L1 Dominating | I1 Welcomed and effective | M1 Not supported and weak | N1 Known and Safe | S1 Strong and Stable |
F2 Strong | L2 Strong | I2 Welcomed but not effective | M2 Not supported and strong | N2 Known and unsafe | S2 Stable |
F3 Weak | L3 Weak | I3 Not welcomed but effective | M3 Supported but weak | N3 Unknown and safe | S3 Shaky |
F4 Ineffective | L4 Ineffective | I4 Not welcomed nor effective | M4 Supported and strong | N4 Unknown and unsafe | S4 Unstable |
 |  | I5 No intervention |  |  |  |