Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of tools and aspects addressed in the reviewed literature

From: Methods for assessing future scenarios from a sustainability perspective

Case study

Tools

Environmental aspects considered

Social aspects considered

ICT?

Time frame

Arushanyan et al. (2017) [31]

SAFS

Land, water, chemicals, mineral and energy use, GHG emissions

Participation and influence in society, health conditions, equity and justice, social cohesion, and learning and education

Yes

2060

Martire et al. (2015) [32]

SIA

Energy use, GHG, air pollution

Employment

No

2020

König et al. (2013) [33]

FoPIA

Abiotic resources (water, soil), biotic resources (biodiversity), ecosystems (land, soil, water)

Work, quality of life (health, life expectancy, income), food security

No

Between 2015 and 2030 depending on case study

Baard et al. (2012) [34]

Checklists, qualitative mapping of consequences, Goal conflict analysis, CBA

GHG emissions biodiversity, coastal defense and land use

Health and safety, working life, housing, equity

No

Two planning horizons: 2030 and 2060

Kowalski et al. (2009) [35]

Qualitative mapping, LCA, PMCA

Climate change Air quality, Rational use of resources, water quality. Cumulated energy input Cumulated material input

Phosphorus Nitrogen AOX

CSB

Noise

Security of supply

Regional self-determinacy, social cohesion, employment, effect on public spending, import dependency, noise, quality of landscape, social justice, ecological justice.

No

2020

Svenfelt et al. in Fauré (2016) [36]

Goal conflict analysis

Swedish Environmental Quality Objectives

 

No

2060

Swedish Energy Agency (2016) [37]

Goal conflict analysis

Impacts on forests and agricultural land, emissions to air and water, impact on ecosystems, bird species, chemical and toxic substances released in the environment

 

No

2035 and towards 2050

Sheate et al. (2008) [38]

Qualitative impact assessment

Biodiversity, protection of natural resources, energy

Health, equity, culture

No

2030

Cartmell et al. (2006) [39]

Qualitative impact assessment

Environmental performance and Flexibility

Economic performance, Social impact,

No

n.s

Tzanopolous et al. (2011) [40]

NA, qualitative impact assessment

Biodiversity, natural resources

Education, health and elderly care, cultural heritage, with the addition of local development, local participation and institutional efficiency.

No

Approx. 2035

Boron et al. (2016) [41]

NA, qualitative impact assessment

To conserve species richness and diversity, maintain ecosystem services, maintain ecosystem resilience to climate change and natural disasters, connectivity

Better healthcare, education and housing, to improve security, human rights and social equity, maintain food security and farming cultural heritage. to increase employment and income, increase smallholders potential and competitiveness, increase municipality income, strengthen institutions and law enforcements, increase local participation and conserve native habitats and connectivity.

No

Approx. 2040

Nilsson et al. (2005) [42]

LCA

Energy consumption, global warming potential, ozone layer depletion, photochemical oxidation, acidification, eutrophication, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, marine aquatic ecotoxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, and human toxicity

 

No

2008

Bouvart et al. (2011) [43]

LCA

GHG emissions, energy consumption, NOx, SOx

 

No

2020–2050

Chen et al. (2012) [44]

LCA

Global warming (GWP), abiotic depletion, acidification, eutrophication, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, ozone depletion, photochemical ozone creation or summer smog, terrestrial ecotoxicity.

 

No

n.s.

Dandres et al. (2012) [45]

M-LCA

Human health, global warming, natural resources, ecosystems

 

No

2005–2025

Santoyo- Castelazo and Azapagic (2014) [46]

LCA, MCA

Same as in Chen et al. above

Security and diversity of supply; public acceptability, intergenerational issues

No

2050

Gujba et al. (2011) [47]

LCA

GHG emissions

 

No

2030

Malmodin and Bergmark (2015) [48]

LCA

GHG emissions

 

Yes

2030

Münster et al. (2013) [49]

LCA

GHG emissions Renewable energy

 

No

Two case studies (2030; and 2050)

Björklund (2012) [50]

LCA

Climate change

Photochemical oxidation

Acidification

Eutrophication

Nox

SOx

NH3

Particulates

 

No

n.s.

Singh and Strømman (2013) [51]

LCA

GHG, NOx, SO2, particulate matter

 

No

2012–2020

Berrill et al. (2016) [52]

LCA

GHG emissions, land use and use of non-renewable resources.

 

No

2050

Foolmaun and Ramjeeawon (2013) [53]

S-LCA, LCA

Carcinogens, res- piratory organics, respiratory inorganics, climate change, radiation, ecotoxicity, ozone layer, acidification/eutrophica- tion, land use, mineral and fossil fuel

Child labour, fair salary, forced labour, health and safety, social benefit/social security, discrimination, contribution to economic development and community engagement

No

n.s.

Rugani et al. (2015) [54]

S-LCA

 

Child Labour

Collective bargaining

Corruption

Drinking water quality

Excessive working time

Forced Labour

Gender Equity

High Conflict

Hospital Beds

Improved Sanitation

Indigenous Rights

Injuries and Fatalities

Legal System

Migrant labour

Poverty Wage

Toxic and Hazards

No

2010–2025

Stamford and Azapagic (2014) [55]

LCSA

Recyclability of inputs, water toxicity, GWP, ozone layer, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical oxidant, land occupation, terrestrial toxicity, were considered, and on the social side employment, work injuries, human toxicity, health, fatalities, avoiding imports, diversity fuel mix, fuel storage, handling of uranium, resource use, radioactive waste.

Employment, work injuries, human toxicity, health, fatalities, avoiding imports, diversity fuel mix, fuel storage, handling of uranium, resource use, radioactive waste.

No

2070

Wijkman and Skånberg (2015) [56]

I-O analysis

GHG emissions

Employment

No

2030

Anderson et al. (2008) [57]

MCA, value rose chart

Habitat change/conversion

Land take/release

Atmospheric deposition

Resource extraction

Waste management

Risk to the natural environment

Water quantity

Eco-centric culture

Resilience

Social exclusion & inequality

Impacts on poorer countries

Cultural diversity

Health

No

2050

Onat et al. (2016) [58]

MCA

Carbon, water, energy, hazardous waste, fishery, grazing, forestry, cropland, CO2 uptake land

Taxes and injuries.

No

n.s.

López et al. (2012) [59]

MCA

CO2 and PM/NOx emissions, noise

Transport safety and equity, accessibility and employment

No

2030

Hickman et al. (2012) [60]

MCA

Noise, Vibration and air quality

Accessibility, safety and access to jobs

No

2030

Streimikiene et al. (2016) [61]

MCA

Contribution of renewable energy, climate change and other emissions, waste treatment and natural local conditions

Social welfare (jobs, economic security), education, energy, culture and public acceptance

No

n.s.

Karami et al. (2017) [62]

SD

 

Perceived wellbeing, Quality of life, Social structure development, Rural and agricultural economic conditions, Conservation of community resources.

No

n.s.

Hilty et al. (2006) [63]

SD

GHG emissions

 

Yes

2020

Ahmadi Achachlouei and Hilty (2015) [64]

SD

Total energy consumption, share of electricity generation from renewable resources, GHG emissions, municipal solid waste not recycled.

 

Yes

2020

Ljunggren Söderman et al. (2016) [65]

EMEC, LCA

Climate change, ozone depletion, human toxicity, Photochemical oxidant formation, Particulate matter formation, Ionising radiation, Terrestrial acidification, freshwater eutrophication, Marine eutrophication, terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity, agricultural land occupation, urban land occupation, natural land transformation, water depletion, metal depletion, fossil depletion

 

No

2030

IPCC (Riahi et al. (2011) [66] van vuuren et al. (2011) [67], Thomson et al. (2011) [68])

Integrated models

GHG and short-lived species including CO2, CH4, N2O, NOx, VOCs, CO, SO2, carbonaceous aerosols, HFCs, PFCs, NH3, and SF6.

 

No

2010–2100

  1. n.s: not specified in the paper