- Open Access
Erratum to: How to justify beliefs about the future - some epistemological remarks
European Journal of Futures Research volume 4, Article number: 2 (2016)
Erratum to: Eur J Futures Res (2015) 3:17
Due to technical problems during correction of the paper some minor errors occurred:
On page 2 of 6, in chapter “The basics of thoughts concerning the future” in two logical expressions there is a logical AND “˄” resp. a logical OR “˅” missing.
Instead of “(∀x ¬ (x ¬ x))” it should read “(∀x ¬ (x ˄¬ x))” and instead of “(∀x (x ¬ x))” it should read “(∀x (x ˅¬ x))”. These mistakes are in the PDF only
In the abstract several hyphenations can be found which are not correct in these places, i.e. logi-cal (row 2 in the PDF), unam-biguous (row 13 in the PDF) and Re-garding (row 15 in the PDF).
There is also another mistake (row 15 of the PDF) of the abstract: “internalsim” should of course be “internalism”.
These mistakes showed up in the HTML-version as well.
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40309-015-0076-7.
About this article
Cite this article
Sonk, M. Erratum to: How to justify beliefs about the future - some epistemological remarks. Eur J Futures Res 4, 2 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-016-0083-3