Skip to main content

Erratum to: How to justify beliefs about the future - some epistemological remarks

The Original Article was published on 08 December 2015

Erratum to: Eur J Futures Res (2015) 3:17

DOI 10.1007/s40309-015-0076-7

Due to technical problems during correction of the paper some minor errors occurred:

On page 2 of 6, in chapter “The basics of thoughts concerning the future” in two logical expressions there is a logical AND “˄” resp. a logical OR “˅” missing.

Instead of “(x ¬ (x ¬ x))” it should read “(x ¬ (x ˄¬ x))” and instead of “(x (x ¬ x))” it should read “(x (x ˅¬ x))”. These mistakes are in the PDF only

In the abstract several hyphenations can be found which are not correct in these places, i.e. logi-cal (row 2 in the PDF), unam-biguous (row 13 in the PDF) and Re-garding (row 15 in the PDF).

There is also another mistake (row 15 of the PDF) of the abstract: “internalsim” should of course be “internalism”.

These mistakes showed up in the HTML-version as well.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthias Sonk.

Additional information

The online version of the original article can be found at

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonk, M. Erratum to: How to justify beliefs about the future - some epistemological remarks. Eur J Futures Res 4, 2 (2016).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: