Table 2 Overall degree of scenario consistency in the UBA and Lima Water case (across actors and forms of scenarios) (own assessments on a 6 point scale: 1 not given at all, 6 fully given, consistency criterion of CIB if not indicated otherwise)
From: New outlooks in traceability and consistency of integrated scenarios
Cases dimensions | UBA | Lima water |
|---|---|---|
1)Internal consistency | 6= fully given | 5= given across all forms of scenarios except for 1 out of 4 scenarios |
2)Consistency within | 6= fully given | 4= rather given, except for 1 out of 4 scenarios |
3)Consistency between different forms of scenarios | (does not apply) | 4= rather apparently given across raw, narrative, numerical (input side) and integrated scenarios |
4)Consistency of underlying models | (Neither systematically & explicitly compared nor adapted) | 2= rather not given |