Table 2 Impact matrix
Scenario | Scenario A Worst-case scenario | Scenario B Shift to hinterland | Scenario C Shift to sea | Scenario D Shift to both sea and hinterland | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evaluation criteria | ||||||
Domain | Environment | Κ1 | Very bad | Good | Moderate | Perfect |
Κ2 | More or Less Bad | More or Less Good | Very Good | Moderate | ||
Κ3 | Very Bad | Good | Moderate | Perfect | ||
Economy | Κ4 | Very Bad | Perfect | More or Less Bad | Perfect | |
K5 | Very bad | Good | Moderate | Perfect | ||
Κ6 | Bad | Very Good | More or Less Bad | Perfect | ||
Society | Κ7 | Bad | Perfect | More or Less Bad | Very good | |
Κ8 | Extremely Bad | Perfect | Moderate | Very Good | ||
Spatial pattern | Κ9 | Very bad | Very good | More or Less Bad | Perfect | |
Hosting infrastructures | K10 | Bad | Very good | Moderate | Perfect | |