Skip to main content

Table 4 Themes, key issues, and main dimensions of scenario analysis for the Futures Workshop

From: A hybrid foresight study of the environmental reference laboratory system in Finland: a foresight study for the Government of Finland

Themes

Key questions of workshop topics

X-axis/the main dimensions of the scenarios

Y-axis/the main dimensions of the scenarios

Coordination

Coordination of reference laboratory activities for environmental measurements in 2030

Distributed or centralized?

Strong or weak coordination?

Ownership

Ownership of reference laboratory operations for environmental measurements in 2030

Owners: public vs. private

Ownership: national vs. global

Technologies

Response of the reference laboratory function for environmental measurements to technological change by 2030

Focus on measurement data collection vs. interpretation

Technology solutions are device-based vs. system-based

BCG-analysis 2030, radical technologies

Ranking of new technologies affecting reference laboratory operations in 2030 in terms of growth rate and scope of operations

Technology volume small vs. large

Technology growth rate high vs. low

New measurement targets

The most important new measures to be taken into account in environmental activities in 2030 in various technology and measurable volume options from the point of view of reference laboratories

Measurable amount small vs. large

Emphasis on technological development: current technologies as a rule vs. new technologies as a rule

Security of supply

How to prepare for the preservation of environmental measurement capabilities in the event of a crisis, what is the role of reference laboratories in 2030?

Readiness to measure: immediate readiness vs. delayed readiness

Taking measurements nationally vs. internationally